2013 Squier 51 Review

My first electric guitar was an MIK Squier Stratocaster, with a rosewood fretboard, in an aged Olymipic White with a black guard and white plastic.  I traded that guitar towards a Yamaha Pacifica, thinking that I was taking a big leap forward.



Aside: I wasn't, but that doesn't mean the Pacifica was a mistake.  It was, and still is, a solid beginner guitar.  Don't believe me?  Check out Rob Chapman's latest video here

When I finally purchased a USA Fender though, it was a Telecaster.  I'm not sure if it was Pete Anderson, Jimmy Page at MSG, or a combination, but I wanted a Tele, not a Strat.

Years later, it was because of the Squier that when I had the opportunity to buy my Eric Johnson Stratocaster in White Blonde, I jumped.  The first thing I did was put a black pickguard on it.


When I came across a "like new" Squier 51 in Vintage Blond, a Frankenstein of a Stratocaster, Telecaster, and early Fender bass, I knew it was time for a new guitar.

Finish

The first and deciding factor in my acquisition of this guitar was the finish.  I love Fender's blondes - 01 and 07 in case you're wondering.  This one is a 07, decidedly less white than my Eric Johnson Stratocaster, though they need to be side by side to really see the difference.


Aside from color, the finish is applied evenly and without a trace of blemish.  The one irregularity I noticed was in the pickguard, where just above the upper left corner of the humbucker in the picture above you can see the cut wasn't clean.  Since there is more material than required, I can eventually just sand it smooth.

Neck

Unlike the Squier Jaguar I own (also made in Indonesia), this guitar's tuners seem quite good - I've tuned once since owning it.  The fixed bridge certainly helps, but tuner slip seems to be absent here.  The Jaguar, on the other hand, needed a replacement set before approaching playable.


The neck construction is a different story though.  Instead of a faux-nitro, slightly tinted affair, this neck is a raw maple neck that was about as smooth as a bag of nails and splinters.  Q/C took a break on the day this came out of the factory, but thankfully the frets were level, with no sharp edges to be found.


The neck could be fixed with 2000 grit finish polishing paper to the neck and two minutes of sanding. Now back of the neck is close to perfect  - closer to the feel of my American Telecaster than I'm comfortable admitting.  It just goes to show that labor is the major factor in the cost of higher end instruments.


This is still a beginner neck though, narrow in both width and girth.  It's comfortable, but compared to  modern USA instruments you'll immediately notice a difference.  It reminds me of an early 60s Stratocaster that appeared at a local store a few years back - I remembered being shocked at how narrow the neck was.

Pickups

One of the really interesting things about this guitar is the surprising number of sounds you can pull despite the minimalist approach to the controls.  While the "tone knob" acting as the pickups selector is a nice change from standard Stratocaster or Telecaster switching, it's akin to Jaguar switching - novel but uncommon for a reason.

Back to range of tones - the volume is a push pull affair, allowing you to split the bridge pickup for convincing single coil sounds.  Given then string through body construction, it's hardly surprising that these split coil tones lean more towards Telecasters, but a closer listen reveals that it has as much to do with some upper register aggression (bordering on harshness) from what I can only suspect is a ceramic pickup.


In full humbucker mode, it's about what you'd expect - a pickup designed to capture the imagination of a beginner rather than something more dynamic.  That means bark and little else.  The neck pickup is a bit more subdued, but not by much.  It reminds me of the singles from the Squier Standard last year.  They're not bad for the price.

Still, I'm interested in something better, so the happy coincidence of a local selling a GFS Retrotron Nashville set means I'll be replacing the bridge pickup sooner rather than later.  The neck pickup will have to wait though.

Hardware

There doesn't seem for be much to go wrong here, but I have noticed that despite the relative simplicity of the bridge setup, there is some ungodly rattle coming off the G string when fretting certain notes.  I'm certain it is the bridge, because applying palm pressure to adjacent saddles seems to eliminate the buzz.  Something tells me that one of the height adjustment screws is off - with the sides of the saddles being squared, one of these screws could be slightly raised without causing the corresponding lean in the saddle.

Two potential solutions.  If my hunch is correct, a simple adjustment will take care of it.  If not, new saddles may be called for.  I'd consider a new bridge, but the string through spacing vis-a-vis the mounting screw spacing seems weird, and I'm not willing to start filling this thing full of holes.  It's a  keeper so long as I'm entertained by it, so any change needs to be reversible. New saddles are an option, if only because they can be removed and are useful on other instruments with similar spacing if I do decide to sell.

 The Verdict

Overall, I'm really pleased with this guitar.  It just goes to show that with $200, a little patience, know-how, and some time on your hands, you can get yourself a really great looking, off the beaten path kind of guitar.




Popular posts from this blog

Pacifica 112 vs. Squier Standard Stratocaster

Squier Jaguar Review - What do you mean, modified?

1985 Contemporary Stratocaster Review

Marshall DSL1-C Review